You're right, I hadn't noticed the ISP change. I should have looked closer about that. Quite possible multiple people are using the account, could be Loell, could be a friend, could be someone she's working with, unless we know for sure...we don't know for sure. I also though, would like to see the source of the IP and Skype information before believing it, without anything backing it up it's just text on a page.
Literally the only thing here that makes me question any of this is the whois lookup, which likewise, is just a name on an account. All we know is that a name that is similar to Loell's is on the account.
I can't honestly say that it proves that she doesn't have a connection with Edmonton, only that she does have a connection with Minnesota. We've established she works from Minnesota currently, and likely has been there a while, but is there evidence of where she is actually from?
Unless you can say for sure that she's lived in Minnesota forever, this argument doesn't really work.
I saw the meetme, that's so fake it's not even worth mentioning.
How sure can you really be that she's not originally from Canada? I know multiple people that live somewhere and refer to themselves as being from somewhere else because they were born/raised there. Look at Savant, he's from Norway, everyone knows he's from Norway, but he's been living and working in the US for years.
Also I know this could well be fake, but if you watch her Q & A video, she has a Canadian accent (I'm fairly aware. I do live on the Canadian border) and a Minnesota accent is VERY different. I realize this is also not hard evidence, but it's unlikely for someone that has lived in Minnesota their whole life to have a Canadian accent.
The soundcould could very well be a troll. Possibly on either side. If you can dig up evidence on that, show me. You're right.
I don't believe you, and I'm well aware of the popularity, quality, all of that. None of that is evidence, it's using a theory to support itself.
The argument this site makes is clear, these connections are all rather tenuous. While there is a lot of suspicious evidence given, there are many explanations and possibilities for everything going on here. It seems like all of this is just speculation and loose evidence, not proof.
It happens literally all the time with humans, we see a suspicious situation and come up with the most interesting and controversial conclusion, then find whatever evidence we can and stretch it to fit our needs.